Insights Library

Evidence. Analysis.
Intelligence.

Documented client results, original research analysis, and strategic intelligence briefs. Everything here is sourced, measured, and built for decision-makers who need facts, not opinions.

Documented Engagements
Research and Analysis

What the 2025 behavioral data
means before you commit

Three independent Gallup studies. Over 25,000 respondents. Interpreted through the lens of forensic leadership due diligence. These are not summaries. They are briefs for principals reading the people behind a consequential decision.

Value Creation Risk March 2026

The Hidden Drag on Your Value-Creation Plan

Six in ten workers lack what Gallup defines as a quality job (18,429 surveyed). In a target company, that is not an HR statistic. It is unpriced execution risk sitting directly on top of your value-creation thesis.

Gallup's 2025 American Job Quality Study measured five dimensions that define whether a job works for the person in it: financial well-being, workplace culture and safety, growth and development opportunities, agency and voice, and work structure and autonomy. Only 40% of U.S. workers met minimum thresholds across at least three of those five dimensions.

The data is striking by segment. Only 28% of employees with a high school education or less hold quality jobs. Just 29% of workers aged 18 to 24 do. In leisure and hospitality, the number drops to 29%. In retail, 26%. In warehousing, 26%.

But here is the finding that matters most to decision-makers: employees in quality jobs are more than twice as likely to be highly satisfied at work (58% vs. 23%), nearly twice as likely to rate their health as excellent or good (49% vs. 33%), and significantly less likely to leave. The business case is not abstract. It is a retention equation, a productivity equation, and a healthcare cost equation, all at once.

What This Means for the Deal

Traditional tools measure engagement through surveys. Gallup's data shows the problem is structural, not attitudinal. When 25% of employees see zero path to advancement and 55% have no meaningful voice in decisions that affect them, the issue is not that people are disengaged. The issue is that the behavioral environment is engineered for disengagement, and it sits inside the company you are about to back.

This is the exact gap forensic leadership due diligence is designed to close. REMI does not ask employees how they feel. It reads the behavioral signals that predict how they will act, surfaces the structural misalignments causing the problem, and tells you what to do about it before the cost shows up after close.

The Bottom Line for the Principal

If 60% of a target workforce does not have what Gallup defines as a quality job, the deal does not have an engagement problem. It has a behavioral architecture problem. And it is measurable, predictable, and actionable, if you have the right intelligence before you commit.

Source: Gallup American Job Quality Study, 2025. 18,429 U.S. workers surveyed January-February 2025. Conducted in partnership with Jobs for the Future, the Families and Workers Fund, and the W.E. Upjohn Institute.
QDOT Intelligence Brief
Forensic Leadership Due Diligence Analysis
Management Team Risk March 2026

Why Management Risk Is the Diligence You Skip

Studies of failed deals point repeatedly to the same culprit: not the model, the market, or the price, but the management team and its ability to execute. It is the one diligence stream that is still run on conversation and instinct rather than evidence.

The 2025 Bentley-Gallup Business in Society Survey found that Americans trust businesses more than the federal government to act in society's best interest (43% vs. 31%). They believe businesses are becoming more effective. And 65% now say businesses have a positive impact on their lives, a 10-point rise since 2022.

But there is a persistent 27-point gap between what Americans believe businesses can do (87%) and what they see businesses actually doing (60%). That gap has not closed in three years of tracking.

The implications for talent leaders are direct. 96% of Americans say it is important for companies to offer quality healthcare. 91% say mental health support matters. 91% expect businesses to operate sustainably. 90% expect businesses to work to improve the world. In every one of these categories, Americans see businesses falling short.

Where Forensic Diligence Changes the Equation

This is not a branding problem. Employees are not reading a mission statement and deciding whether they believe it. They are experiencing the behavioral environment of the organization every day and forming conclusions based on what they see, not what they are told.

When a manager makes a promotion decision based on tenure instead of capability, the team registers it. When a retention strategy consists of a salary bump instead of addressing the behavioral root cause of dissatisfaction, people notice. When leadership talks about employee wellbeing but the behavioral data shows no investment in development pathways, the gap widens.

Forensic leadership due diligence measures that gap at the individual, team, and organizational level. It does not survey people about how they feel. It analyzes the behavioral signals that predict what they will do and tells you what to do about it before it becomes a line item in your post-close write-down.

The IC Question

If your diligence is tracking financial performance, market position, and operational efficiency, but not the behavioral health of the management team with the same rigor, you are flying blind on the single largest variable that drives all three.

Source: Bentley University-Gallup Business in Society Survey, 2025. 3,007 U.S. adults surveyed May 2025. Fourth annual administration of the study.
QDOT Intelligence Brief
Forensic Leadership Due Diligence Analysis
First 90 Days March 2026

The First 90 Days Decide the Return

Value is won or lost in the first 90 days post-close, when a new owner must read a team it did not build and move fast. The behavioral data shows that team is arriving under more strain than any prior cohort: Gen Z adult thriving has dropped to 39%, a 17-point fall from their student years.

The 2025 Walton Family Foundation-Gallup Voices of Gen Z study surveyed nearly 3,800 people aged 13 to 28. The headline finding: overall thriving among Gen Z declined to 45%, the lowest in three years of the study. But the real story is in the split between students and adults.

Gen Z students in middle and high school are actually improving. 56% are thriving, the highest measured level. But once they enter the adult workforce, that number collapses to 39%. The 17-point gap between student thriving and adult thriving is the largest ever recorded in this study.

The decline is driven primarily by Gen Z women, whose thriving dropped from 46% to 37% in a single year. It cuts across political lines. And it is not unique to Gen Z; Gallup's broader national survey showed U.S. adult thriving hit a five-year low in 2025. But Gen Z adults are 10 points less likely to be thriving than older generations, a pattern that has held across all three years of the study.

What This Means Post-Close

Organizations are investing heavily in attracting Gen Z talent. But the data says this generation is arriving at the workplace door with lower life satisfaction, lower thriving, and a wider gap between their school experience and their work experience than any prior cohort measured.

The study found that engagement is the decisive factor. Students who had five or more engaging classroom experiences were significantly more likely to be thriving, optimistic about the future, and prepared for life after school. The implication for any acquirer is direct: if a target does not have an environment that replicates that engagement, its Gen Z workforce will disengage faster than the existing one, and that risk transfers to you at close.

Traditional onboarding and development programs are not designed for this. They are designed for a workforce that arrives with a baseline of stability and grows from there. Gen Z is arriving with a deficit. The intervention has to be behavioral, personalized, and early.

The Forensic Leadership Due Diligence Approach

REMI reads the behavioral profile of every new hire against the behavioral demands of the role, the team dynamics they are entering, and the management style of their direct supervisor. It does not wait 90 days to see if someone is struggling. It predicts the friction points before day one and prescribes the specific interventions, talk tracks, and development adjustments that prevent the 17-point thriving deficit from becoming your next attrition stat.

Source: Walton Family Foundation-Gallup Voices of Gen Z Study, Year 3 Annual Report, 2025. 3,800 Gen Zers (ages 13-28) surveyed May 2025.
QDOT Intelligence Brief
Forensic Leadership Due Diligence Analysis
Across All Engagements
$50M+
Documented Client Impact
940%
ROI Delivered
75%
Turnover Reduction
$4.5M
Profit Swing, Single Engagement
Next Steps

We take on a select few.
Access is by interview.

Request an Interview →